Note

Click here to download the full example code

# Quantum transfer learning¶

In this tutorial we apply a machine learning method, known as *transfer learning*, to an
image classifier based on a hybrid classical-quantum network.

This example follows the general structure of the PyTorch tutorial on transfer learning by Sasank Chilamkurthy, with the crucial difference of using a quantum circuit to perform the final classification task.

More details on this topic can be found in the research paper [1] (Mari et al. (2019)).

## Introduction¶

Transfer learning is a well-established technique for training artificial neural networks (see e.g., Ref. [2]), which is based on the general intuition that if a pre-trained network is good at solving a given problem, then, with just a bit of additional training, it can be used to also solve a different but related problem.

As discussed in Ref. [1], this idea can be formalized in terms of two abstract netwoks \(A\) and \(B\), independently from their quantum or classical physical nature.

As sketched in the above figure, one can give the following **general definition of the
transfer learning method**:

- Take a network \(A\) that has been pre-trained on a dataset \(D_A\) and for a given task \(T_A\).
- Remove some of the final layers. In this way, the resulting truncated network \(A'\) can be used as a feature extractor.
- Connect a new trainable network \(B\) at the end of the pre-trained network \(A'\).
- Keep the weights of \(A'\) constant, and train the final block \(B\) with a new dataset \(D_B\) and/or for a new task of interest \(T_B\).

When dealing with hybrid systems, depending on the physical nature (classical or quantum) of the networks \(A\) and \(B\), one can have different implementations of transfer learning as

summarized in following table:

Network A | Network B | Tansfer learning scheme |
---|---|---|

Classical | Classical | CC - Standard classical method. See e.g., Ref. [2]. |

Classical | Quantum | CQ - Hybrid model presented in this tutorial. |

Quantum | Classical | QC - Model studied in Ref. [1]. |

Quantum | Quantum | QQ - Model studied in Ref. [1]. |

## Classical-to-quantum transfer learning¶

We focus on the CQ transfer learning scheme discussed in the previous section and we give a specific example.

- As pre-trained network \(A\) we use
**ResNet18**, a deep residual neural network introduced by Microsoft in Ref. [3], which is pre-trained on the*ImageNet*dataset. - After removing its final layer we obtain \(A'\), a pre-processing block which maps any input high-resolution image into 512 abstract features.
- Such features are classified by a 4-qubit “dressed quantum circuit” \(B\), i.e., a variational quantum circuit sandwiched between two classical layers.
- The hybrid model is trained, keeping \(A'\) constant, on the
*Hymenoptera*dataset (a small subclass of ImageNet) containing images of*ants*and*bees*.

A graphical representation of the full data processing pipeline is given in the figure below.

## General setup¶

Note

To use the PyTorch interface in PennyLane, you must first install PyTorch.

In addition to *PennyLane*, we will also need some standard *PyTorch* libraries and the
plotting library *matplotlib*.

```
# Some parts of this code are based on the Python script:
# https://github.com/pytorch/tutorials/blob/master/beginner_source/transfer_learning_tutorial.py
# License: BSD
# Plotting
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
# PyTorch
import torch
import torch.nn as nn
import torch.optim as optim
from torch.optim import lr_scheduler
import torchvision
from torchvision import datasets, models, transforms
# Pennylane
import pennylane as qml
from pennylane import numpy as np
# Other tools
import time
import os
import copy
# OpenMP: number of parallel threads.
os.environ["OMP_NUM_THREADS"] = "1"
```

## Setting of the main hyper-parameters of the model¶

Note

To reproduce the results of Ref. [1], `num_epochs`

should be set to `30`

which may take a long time.
We suggest to first try with `num_epochs=1`

and, if everything runs smoothly, increase it to a larger value.

```
n_qubits = 4 # Number of qubits
step = 0.0004 # Learning rate
batch_size = 4 # Number of samples for each training step
num_epochs = 1 # Number of training epochs
q_depth = 6 # Depth of the quantum circuit (number of variational layers)
gamma_lr_scheduler = 0.1 # Learning rate reduction applied every 10 epochs.
q_delta = 0.01 # Initial spread of random quantum weights
rng_seed = 0 # Seed for random number generator
start_time = time.time() # Start of the computation timer
```

We initialize a PennyLane device with a `default.qubit`

backend.

```
dev = qml.device("default.qubit", wires=n_qubits)
```

We configure PyTorch to use CUDA only if available. Otherwise the CPU is used.

```
device = torch.device("cuda:0" if torch.cuda.is_available() else "cpu")
```

## Dataset loading¶

Note

The dataset containing images of *ants* and *bees* can be downloaded
here and
should be extracted in the subfolder `../_data/hymenoptera_data`

.

This is a very small dataset (roughly 250 images), too small for training from scratch a
classical or quantum model, however it is enough when using *transfer learning* approach.

The PyTorch packages `torchvision`

and `torch.utils.data`

are used for loading the dataset
and performing standard preliminary image operations: resize, center, crop, normalize, *etc.*

```
data_transforms = {
"train": transforms.Compose(
[
# transforms.RandomResizedCrop(224), # uncomment for data augmentation
# transforms.RandomHorizontalFlip(), # uncomment for data augmentation
transforms.Resize(256),
transforms.CenterCrop(224),
transforms.ToTensor(),
# Normalize input channels using mean values and standard deviations of ImageNet.
transforms.Normalize([0.485, 0.456, 0.406], [0.229, 0.224, 0.225]),
]
),
"val": transforms.Compose(
[
transforms.Resize(256),
transforms.CenterCrop(224),
transforms.ToTensor(),
transforms.Normalize([0.485, 0.456, 0.406], [0.229, 0.224, 0.225]),
]
),
}
data_dir = "../_data/hymenoptera_data"
image_datasets = {
x: datasets.ImageFolder(os.path.join(data_dir, x), data_transforms[x]) for x in ["train", "val"]
}
dataset_sizes = {x: len(image_datasets[x]) for x in ["train", "val"]}
class_names = image_datasets["train"].classes
# Initialize dataloader
dataloaders = {
x: torch.utils.data.DataLoader(image_datasets[x], batch_size=batch_size, shuffle=True)
for x in ["train", "val"]
}
# function to plot images
def imshow(inp, title=None):
"""Display image from tensor."""
inp = inp.numpy().transpose((1, 2, 0))
# Inverse of the initial normalization operation.
mean = np.array([0.485, 0.456, 0.406])
std = np.array([0.229, 0.224, 0.225])
inp = std * inp + mean
inp = np.clip(inp, 0, 1)
plt.imshow(inp)
if title is not None:
plt.title(title)
```

Let us show a batch of the test data, just to have an idea of the classification problem.

```
# Get a batch of training data
inputs, classes = next(iter(dataloaders["val"]))
# Make a grid from batch
out = torchvision.utils.make_grid(inputs)
imshow(out, title=[class_names[x] for x in classes])
# In order to get reproducible results, we set a manual seed for the
# random number generator and re-initialize the dataloaders.
torch.manual_seed(rng_seed)
dataloaders = {
x: torch.utils.data.DataLoader(image_datasets[x], batch_size=batch_size, shuffle=True)
for x in ["train", "val"]
}
```

## Variational quantum circuit¶

We first define some quantum layers that will compose the quantum circuit.

```
def H_layer(nqubits):
"""Layer of single-qubit Hadamard gates.
"""
for idx in range(nqubits):
qml.Hadamard(wires=idx)
def RY_layer(w):
"""Layer of parametrized qubit rotations around the y axis.
"""
for idx, element in enumerate(w):
qml.RY(element, wires=idx)
def entangling_layer(nqubits):
"""Layer of CNOTs followed by another shifted layer of CNOT.
"""
# In other words it should apply something like :
# CNOT CNOT CNOT CNOT... CNOT
# CNOT CNOT CNOT... CNOT
for i in range(0, nqubits - 1, 2): # Loop over even indices: i=0,2,...N-2
qml.CNOT(wires=[i, i + 1])
for i in range(1, nqubits - 1, 2): # Loop over odd indices: i=1,3,...N-3
qml.CNOT(wires=[i, i + 1])
```

Now we define the quantum circuit through the PennyLane qnode decorator .

The structure is that of a typical variational quantum circuit:

**Embedding layer:**All qubits are first initialized in a balanced superposition of*up*and*down*states, then they are rotated according to the input parameters (local embedding).**Variational layers:**A sequence of trainable rotation layers and constant entangling layers is applied.**Measurement layer:**For each qubit, the local expectation value of the \(Z\) operator is measured. This produces a classical output vector, suitable for additional post-processing.

```
@qml.qnode(dev, interface="torch")
def q_net(q_in, q_weights_flat):
# Reshape weights
q_weights = q_weights_flat.reshape(q_depth, n_qubits)
# Start from state |+> , unbiased w.r.t. |0> and |1>
H_layer(n_qubits)
# Embed features in the quantum node
RY_layer(q_in)
# Sequence of trainable variational layers
for k in range(q_depth):
entangling_layer(n_qubits)
RY_layer(q_weights[k])
# Expectation values in the Z basis
exp_vals = [qml.expval(qml.PauliZ(position)) for position in range(n_qubits)]
return tuple(exp_vals)
```

## Dressed quantum circuit¶

We can now define a custom `torch.nn.Module`

representing a *dressed* quantum circuit.

This is a concatenation of:

- A classical pre-processing layer (
`nn.Linear`

). - A classical activation function (
`torch.tanh`

). - A constant
`np.pi/2.0`

scaling. - The previously defined quantum circuit (
`q_net`

). - A classical post-processing layer (
`nn.Linear`

).

The input of the module is a batch of vectors with 512 real parameters (features) and
the output is a batch of vectors with two real outputs (associated with the two classes
of images: *ants* and *bees*).

```
class Quantumnet(nn.Module):
def __init__(self):
super().__init__()
self.pre_net = nn.Linear(512, n_qubits)
self.q_params = nn.Parameter(q_delta * torch.randn(q_depth * n_qubits))
self.post_net = nn.Linear(n_qubits, 2)
def forward(self, input_features):
pre_out = self.pre_net(input_features)
q_in = torch.tanh(pre_out) * np.pi / 2.0
# Apply the quantum circuit to each element of the batch and append to q_out
q_out = torch.Tensor(0, n_qubits)
q_out = q_out.to(device)
for elem in q_in:
q_out_elem = q_net(elem, self.q_params).float().unsqueeze(0)
q_out = torch.cat((q_out, q_out_elem))
return self.post_net(q_out)
```

## Hybrid classical-quantum model¶

We are finally ready to build our full hybrid classical-quantum network.
We follow the *transfer learning* approach:

- First load the classical pre-trained network
*ResNet18*from the`torchvision.models`

zoo. - Freeze all the weights since they should not be trained.
- Replace the last fully connected layer with our trainable dressed quantum circuit (
`Quantumnet`

).

Note

The *ResNet18* model is automatically downloaded by PyTorch and it may take several minutes (only the first time).

```
model_hybrid = torchvision.models.resnet18(pretrained=True)
for param in model_hybrid.parameters():
param.requires_grad = False
# Notice that model_hybrid.fc is the last layer of ResNet18
model_hybrid.fc = Quantumnet()
# Use CUDA or CPU according to the "device" object.
model_hybrid = model_hybrid.to(device)
```

## Training and results¶

Before training the network we need to specify the *loss* function.

We use, as usual in classification problem, the *cross-entropy* which is
directly available within `torch.nn`

.

```
criterion = nn.CrossEntropyLoss()
```

We also initialize the *Adam optimizer* which is called at each training step
in order to update the weights of the model.

```
optimizer_hybrid = optim.Adam(model_hybrid.fc.parameters(), lr=step)
```

We schedule to reduce the learning rate by a factor of `gamma_lr_scheduler`

every 10 epochs.

```
exp_lr_scheduler = lr_scheduler.StepLR(optimizer_hybrid, step_size=10, gamma=gamma_lr_scheduler)
```

What follows is a training function that will be called later. This function should return a trained model that can be used to make predictions (classifications).

```
def train_model(model, criterion, optimizer, scheduler, num_epochs):
since = time.time()
best_model_wts = copy.deepcopy(model.state_dict())
best_acc = 0.0
best_loss = 10000.0 # Large arbitrary number
best_acc_train = 0.0
best_loss_train = 10000.0 # Large arbitrary number
print("Training started:")
for epoch in range(num_epochs):
# Each epoch has a training and validation phase
for phase in ["train", "val"]:
if phase == "train":
scheduler.step()
# Set model to training mode
model.train()
else:
# Set model to evaluate mode
model.eval()
running_loss = 0.0
running_corrects = 0
# Iterate over data.
n_batches = dataset_sizes[phase] // batch_size
it = 0
for inputs, labels in dataloaders[phase]:
since_batch = time.time()
batch_size_ = len(inputs)
inputs = inputs.to(device)
labels = labels.to(device)
optimizer.zero_grad()
# Track/compute gradient and make an optimization step only when training
with torch.set_grad_enabled(phase == "train"):
outputs = model(inputs)
_, preds = torch.max(outputs, 1)
loss = criterion(outputs, labels)
if phase == "train":
loss.backward()
optimizer.step()
# Print iteration results
running_loss += loss.item() * batch_size_
batch_corrects = torch.sum(preds == labels.data).item()
running_corrects += batch_corrects
print(
"Phase: {} Epoch: {}/{} Iter: {}/{} Batch time: {:.4f}".format(
phase,
epoch + 1,
num_epochs,
it + 1,
n_batches + 1,
time.time() - since_batch,
),
end="\r",
flush=True,
)
it += 1
# Print epoch results
epoch_loss = running_loss / dataset_sizes[phase]
epoch_acc = running_corrects / dataset_sizes[phase]
print(
"Phase: {} Epoch: {}/{} Loss: {:.4f} Acc: {:.4f} ".format(
"train" if phase == "train" else "val ",
epoch + 1,
num_epochs,
epoch_loss,
epoch_acc,
)
)
# Check if this is the best model wrt previous epochs
if phase == "val" and epoch_acc > best_acc:
best_acc = epoch_acc
best_model_wts = copy.deepcopy(model.state_dict())
if phase == "val" and epoch_loss < best_loss:
best_loss = epoch_loss
if phase == "train" and epoch_acc > best_acc_train:
best_acc_train = epoch_acc
if phase == "train" and epoch_loss < best_loss_train:
best_loss_train = epoch_loss
# Print final results
model.load_state_dict(best_model_wts)
time_elapsed = time.time() - since
print("Training completed in {:.0f}m {:.0f}s".format(time_elapsed // 60, time_elapsed % 60))
print("Best test loss: {:.4f} | Best test accuracy: {:.4f}".format(best_loss, best_acc))
return model
```

We are ready to perform the actual training process.

```
model_hybrid = train_model(
model_hybrid, criterion, optimizer_hybrid, exp_lr_scheduler, num_epochs=num_epochs
)
```

Out:

```
Training started:
Phase: train Epoch: 1/1 Iter: 1/62 Batch time: 1.5015
Phase: train Epoch: 1/1 Iter: 2/62 Batch time: 1.5331
Phase: train Epoch: 1/1 Iter: 3/62 Batch time: 1.4899
Phase: train Epoch: 1/1 Iter: 4/62 Batch time: 1.4505
Phase: train Epoch: 1/1 Iter: 5/62 Batch time: 1.4673
Phase: train Epoch: 1/1 Iter: 6/62 Batch time: 1.5075
Phase: train Epoch: 1/1 Iter: 7/62 Batch time: 1.5216
Phase: train Epoch: 1/1 Iter: 8/62 Batch time: 1.5517
Phase: train Epoch: 1/1 Iter: 9/62 Batch time: 1.4968
Phase: train Epoch: 1/1 Iter: 10/62 Batch time: 1.5000
Phase: train Epoch: 1/1 Iter: 11/62 Batch time: 1.4544
Phase: train Epoch: 1/1 Iter: 12/62 Batch time: 1.4425
Phase: train Epoch: 1/1 Iter: 13/62 Batch time: 1.4414
Phase: train Epoch: 1/1 Iter: 14/62 Batch time: 1.4824
Phase: train Epoch: 1/1 Iter: 15/62 Batch time: 1.4378
Phase: train Epoch: 1/1 Iter: 16/62 Batch time: 1.4432
Phase: train Epoch: 1/1 Iter: 17/62 Batch time: 1.4403
Phase: train Epoch: 1/1 Iter: 18/62 Batch time: 1.4960
Phase: train Epoch: 1/1 Iter: 19/62 Batch time: 1.4533
Phase: train Epoch: 1/1 Iter: 20/62 Batch time: 1.4440
Phase: train Epoch: 1/1 Iter: 21/62 Batch time: 1.4863
Phase: train Epoch: 1/1 Iter: 22/62 Batch time: 1.4505
Phase: train Epoch: 1/1 Iter: 23/62 Batch time: 1.4649
Phase: train Epoch: 1/1 Iter: 24/62 Batch time: 1.4784
Phase: train Epoch: 1/1 Iter: 25/62 Batch time: 1.4894
Phase: train Epoch: 1/1 Iter: 26/62 Batch time: 1.5026
Phase: train Epoch: 1/1 Iter: 27/62 Batch time: 1.4839
Phase: train Epoch: 1/1 Iter: 28/62 Batch time: 1.4795
Phase: train Epoch: 1/1 Iter: 29/62 Batch time: 1.5054
Phase: train Epoch: 1/1 Iter: 30/62 Batch time: 1.4684
Phase: train Epoch: 1/1 Iter: 31/62 Batch time: 1.4921
Phase: train Epoch: 1/1 Iter: 32/62 Batch time: 1.4818
Phase: train Epoch: 1/1 Iter: 33/62 Batch time: 1.4593
Phase: train Epoch: 1/1 Iter: 34/62 Batch time: 1.4664
Phase: train Epoch: 1/1 Iter: 35/62 Batch time: 1.4813
Phase: train Epoch: 1/1 Iter: 36/62 Batch time: 1.4877
Phase: train Epoch: 1/1 Iter: 37/62 Batch time: 1.4656
Phase: train Epoch: 1/1 Iter: 38/62 Batch time: 1.4732
Phase: train Epoch: 1/1 Iter: 39/62 Batch time: 1.4842
Phase: train Epoch: 1/1 Iter: 40/62 Batch time: 1.4671
Phase: train Epoch: 1/1 Iter: 41/62 Batch time: 1.5230
Phase: train Epoch: 1/1 Iter: 42/62 Batch time: 1.5129
Phase: train Epoch: 1/1 Iter: 43/62 Batch time: 1.5794
Phase: train Epoch: 1/1 Iter: 44/62 Batch time: 1.4934
Phase: train Epoch: 1/1 Iter: 45/62 Batch time: 1.4983
Phase: train Epoch: 1/1 Iter: 46/62 Batch time: 1.4959
Phase: train Epoch: 1/1 Iter: 47/62 Batch time: 1.5011
Phase: train Epoch: 1/1 Iter: 48/62 Batch time: 1.4657
Phase: train Epoch: 1/1 Iter: 49/62 Batch time: 1.4653
Phase: train Epoch: 1/1 Iter: 50/62 Batch time: 1.4576
Phase: train Epoch: 1/1 Iter: 51/62 Batch time: 1.4668
Phase: train Epoch: 1/1 Iter: 52/62 Batch time: 1.5369
Phase: train Epoch: 1/1 Iter: 53/62 Batch time: 1.5282
Phase: train Epoch: 1/1 Iter: 54/62 Batch time: 1.5170
Phase: train Epoch: 1/1 Iter: 55/62 Batch time: 1.4578
Phase: train Epoch: 1/1 Iter: 56/62 Batch time: 1.4823
Phase: train Epoch: 1/1 Iter: 57/62 Batch time: 1.4771
Phase: train Epoch: 1/1 Iter: 58/62 Batch time: 1.4935
Phase: train Epoch: 1/1 Iter: 59/62 Batch time: 1.5455
Phase: train Epoch: 1/1 Iter: 60/62 Batch time: 1.5712
Phase: train Epoch: 1/1 Iter: 61/62 Batch time: 1.4651
Phase: train Epoch: 1/1 Loss: 0.6916 Acc: 0.5164
Phase: val Epoch: 1/1 Iter: 1/39 Batch time: 0.2843
Phase: val Epoch: 1/1 Iter: 2/39 Batch time: 0.2779
Phase: val Epoch: 1/1 Iter: 3/39 Batch time: 0.2773
Phase: val Epoch: 1/1 Iter: 4/39 Batch time: 0.2781
Phase: val Epoch: 1/1 Iter: 5/39 Batch time: 0.2754
Phase: val Epoch: 1/1 Iter: 6/39 Batch time: 0.2787
Phase: val Epoch: 1/1 Iter: 7/39 Batch time: 0.2880
Phase: val Epoch: 1/1 Iter: 8/39 Batch time: 0.2851
Phase: val Epoch: 1/1 Iter: 9/39 Batch time: 0.2790
Phase: val Epoch: 1/1 Iter: 10/39 Batch time: 0.2806
Phase: val Epoch: 1/1 Iter: 11/39 Batch time: 0.2813
Phase: val Epoch: 1/1 Iter: 12/39 Batch time: 0.2784
Phase: val Epoch: 1/1 Iter: 13/39 Batch time: 0.2781
Phase: val Epoch: 1/1 Iter: 14/39 Batch time: 0.2819
Phase: val Epoch: 1/1 Iter: 15/39 Batch time: 0.2899
Phase: val Epoch: 1/1 Iter: 16/39 Batch time: 0.2800
Phase: val Epoch: 1/1 Iter: 17/39 Batch time: 0.2755
Phase: val Epoch: 1/1 Iter: 18/39 Batch time: 0.2909
Phase: val Epoch: 1/1 Iter: 19/39 Batch time: 0.2962
Phase: val Epoch: 1/1 Iter: 20/39 Batch time: 0.2999
Phase: val Epoch: 1/1 Iter: 21/39 Batch time: 0.3035
Phase: val Epoch: 1/1 Iter: 22/39 Batch time: 0.2876
Phase: val Epoch: 1/1 Iter: 23/39 Batch time: 0.2915
Phase: val Epoch: 1/1 Iter: 24/39 Batch time: 0.2853
Phase: val Epoch: 1/1 Iter: 25/39 Batch time: 0.2812
Phase: val Epoch: 1/1 Iter: 26/39 Batch time: 0.2748
Phase: val Epoch: 1/1 Iter: 27/39 Batch time: 0.2762
Phase: val Epoch: 1/1 Iter: 28/39 Batch time: 0.2759
Phase: val Epoch: 1/1 Iter: 29/39 Batch time: 0.2627
Phase: val Epoch: 1/1 Iter: 30/39 Batch time: 0.2714
Phase: val Epoch: 1/1 Iter: 31/39 Batch time: 0.2738
Phase: val Epoch: 1/1 Iter: 32/39 Batch time: 0.3135
Phase: val Epoch: 1/1 Iter: 33/39 Batch time: 0.3053
Phase: val Epoch: 1/1 Iter: 34/39 Batch time: 0.2934
Phase: val Epoch: 1/1 Iter: 35/39 Batch time: 0.2697
Phase: val Epoch: 1/1 Iter: 36/39 Batch time: 0.2723
Phase: val Epoch: 1/1 Iter: 37/39 Batch time: 0.2766
Phase: val Epoch: 1/1 Iter: 38/39 Batch time: 0.2725
Phase: val Epoch: 1/1 Iter: 39/39 Batch time: 0.0822
Phase: val Epoch: 1/1 Loss: 0.6475 Acc: 0.6732
Training completed in 1m 44s
Best test loss: 0.6475 | Best test accuracy: 0.6732
```

## Visualizing the model predictions¶

We first define a visualization function for a batch of test data.

```
def visualize_model(model, num_images=6, fig_name="Predictions"):
images_so_far = 0
_fig = plt.figure(fig_name)
model.eval()
with torch.no_grad():
for _i, (inputs, labels) in enumerate(dataloaders["val"]):
inputs = inputs.to(device)
labels = labels.to(device)
outputs = model(inputs)
_, preds = torch.max(outputs, 1)
for j in range(inputs.size()[0]):
images_so_far += 1
ax = plt.subplot(num_images // 2, 2, images_so_far)
ax.axis("off")
ax.set_title("[{}]".format(class_names[preds[j]]))
imshow(inputs.cpu().data[j])
if images_so_far == num_images:
return
```

Finally, we can run the previous function to see a batch of images with the corresponding predictions.

```
visualize_model(model_hybrid, num_images=batch_size)
plt.show()
```

## References¶

[1] Andrea Mari, Thomas R. Bromley, Josh Izaac, Maria Schuld, and Nathan Killoran.
*Transfer learning in hybrid classical-quantum neural networks*. arXiv:1912.08278 (2019).

[2] Rajat Raina, Alexis Battle, Honglak Lee, Benjamin Packer, and Andrew Y Ng.
*Self-taught learning: transfer learning from unlabeled data*.
Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Machine Learning*, 759–766 (2007).

[3] Kaiming He, Xiangyu Zhang, Shaoqing ren and Jian Sun. *Deep residual learning for image recognition*.
Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 770-778 (2016).

[4] Ville Bergholm, Josh Izaac, Maria Schuld, Christian Gogolin, Carsten Blank, Keri McKiernan, and Nathan Killoran.
*PennyLane: Automatic differentiation of hybrid quantum-classical computations*. arXiv:1811.04968 (2018).

**Total running time of the script:** ( 1 minutes 45.812 seconds)

## Contents

## Downloads